Identifying and Supporting Your Main Character
A recent discussion in the Academy Forum (free or full membership required) focuses on the matter of how to identify the main character in a story and how to shape the other significant characters so that they enhance the story and fully address its questions and issues. The member who started the topic describes himself as usually writing without a planned story structure, and he often finds that the characters who arise on their own begin vying for control of the story. As a result, he ends up with a melee of sorts and an unhealthy competition for who best serves the story as its main character.
The question at the heart of this discussion is: How do you identify the main character in your story and build her supporting staff?Identifying the Main Character
Chapter 6 of Discovering the Soul of Your Story addresses the matter of how to identify the main character by means of a simple thought experiment, the gist of which is this:
Imagine yourself as Story God, the omnipotent creator of the story world, whose power it is to grant your characters' desires at your whim, regardless of whether they have done anything to deserve it. Then search the world of the story for the one character for whom the magical, unearned granting of a single condition of value will stop the story in its tracks and remove its reason to go on.
Simply put, the character whose satisfaction shuts down the engine of the story is the main character, and it is her journey that we-the-audience will use to gauge the story progress and parse its theme. The other significant characters may be fully fleshed outand, in fact, they must be for the story to be completely toldbut it is the endeavor of the main character that will carry us as we traverse the landscape of the story.
Surrounding Her with a Supporting Cast
The question that follows naturally, then, is whether the other significant characters should be less well-drawn than the main character, so that they don't steal the spotlight. And the answer is no, they should not be less well-drawn. In fact, the better drawn they are the more real they seem and the better our understanding and empathy with the main character.
By way of analogy, imagine yourself as a gardener with a very green thumb, whose garden is filled with beautiful flowers. And I, as a visitor to your garden, identify one flower and ask you to tell me all about it.
Of course, to really introduce me to the flower, you'll need to do more than point at it, highlight its various external features, and describe the inner workings that I can't see with the naked eye. You'll also need to tell me about its local ecologynot only what kind of soil it grows in but how its growth is affected by all of the other plants in its vicinity.
Is one of them a companion to the flowerin a symbiotic relationship? Is another a weed that the "main flower" has had to struggle against to grow to the point that it has? Is another adversely affected by the growth of the "main flower," maybe because the bigger the "main flower" gets the less sunlight is available to its companions, so that their very existence is threatened? And do they have the capacity to fight back?
You get the picture.
The other plants are the core ensemble of characters surrounding the "main flower," and the more I know about them, the better I understand the "main flower." But the story is still completely about the "main flower," because that's what I asked about.
So if you find yourself searching for the main character of your story, simply conduct the "main character thought experiment" to find her. Then determine how the other significant characters fit in to the ecology of her endeavor and flesh them out completely enough so that each sheds a light on her story.
No manure required.
For More Information